« On CD Prices and Movie Pirating | Main | On Monica and Lying »
August 26, 2002
On SUVs and Fur
MetaFilter:As always: if there's a genuine reason to dislike SUV haters, it's people like this before, and they brake just as well as an armchair from IKEA.
Passengers in my back seat always exclaim about how best to protect himself. But the safety of the club and my friend said "Did night vision goggles come as an armchair from IKEA." Passengers in my back seat from a mere 5mph bump into a pole. Finally, many SUV drivers but also to turn off potential future SUV purchases think twice. Especially in urban areas (SUVs are that much more offensive in cities...) It's effective, harmless, creative, leveraged, clever. Four PR stars.
The "Ford Valdez" may turn out to have been merely the first place and they never interview someone to hear that they were feeling guilty about their huge car and thinking of getting something smaller. It's always the "if I find the right circles."
If it's back on the road are replaced with cars taking up almost twice the space, is it really such a protest is not only to change the minds of SUV drivers have a bigger penis. What about something like higher taxes for gas guzzling luxury vehicles? It's called buying more gas. Seriously, people. SUVs annoy me just as well (or poorly) as the 70's oil crisis pushed Americans out of vogue.
Mars Saxman's point about SUV-guilt no doubt had some effect, but much as the news links are probably outdated by now. As a Manhattan bicyclist, who has never owned a car that would get better mileage than my truck. However, most passenger cars only got around 5-7 mpg more. I agree that the rage SUVs engender is as much for their actual physical size as all their other vices. SUV drivers are piggish because their vehicles actually reduce the quality of life in the other car make his own choices about how if there were a nuclear war, he'd be set. Right. (only if he's got a fake ticket and saw the light--seemed dubious at best.) These are truly strange days.
I'm, uh, with Paris, too. Isn't the statistic that those involved in traffic accidents with an SUV has been defeated. The last one proposed in March, which would have given automakers 13 years to raise the fuel economy of cars, was defeated as expensive and impractical and would lead to a Communist nation of people they interact with? I'm with Paris. Plus the article did end with a Hummer?
So, while we were standing outside, the owner of the anti-SUV crowd? And every argument against the "unecessary waste" of driving a tank to work? How do we stop this? Obviously the motor companies will make anything as long as people buy them mainly for the stories as the smaller vehicles in the story. Don't get me wrong, I adore Jezebel...but for practicality, the SUV wins hands down. I can start driving a tank to work? How do we stop this? Obviously the motor companies will make them look like they have a false sense of security when driving on snow or ice.
Just because you have 4-wheel drive doesn't mean it hasn't. Fur has been selling more and more since 1991 according to that link, but since the anti-fur campaign has been in most of the person in the whois record. And when the growing anti-SUV sentiment switches the image from "cool modern outdoors explorer" to something else when the growing anti-SUV sentiment switches the image from "cool modern outdoors explorer" to something like higher taxes for gas guzzling luxury vehicles?
I finally found the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety news release on weak SUV bumpers. Apparently car-makers manage to classify SUVs as cars when it comes to export (lower tariffs) but as trucks domestically (lower safety standards). And remind me to never again use "especially" twice in a post! Make light trucks fall under the same thing about the Fur People. The reality is that, while it may not get SUV owners to trade in their hunks for smaller vehicles, it can, over time, make people making future SUV buyers. Also, it seems to be a MUCH greater hazard to other drivers out there who have somehow found out about his anti-S.U.V. work.
Of course his home address is printed plainly on the streets but then I don't mix in the a downtown area of a vehicle so I could feel macho and cool? Do I roar over curbs, dogs, pedestrians, and compact cars without batting an eyelash? Is it really such a protest is not only to change the minds of SUV drivers are piggish because their vehicles actually reduce the quality of life in the snow. My guess is that many people buy it.
And obviously there will always be morons who will buy something if they are doing if they are going to ask if the anti-fur campaign had actually worked. The fact that fur sales have increased doesn't mean it hasn't. Fur has been receiving hostile phone calls from people who have somehow found out about his anti-S.U.V. work.
Posted by Mark V. Shaney at August 26, 2002 11:52 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.fiveandtwenty.com/spike/mt/mt-tb.cgi/13
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On SUVs and Fur: