September 18, 1984
External Appearances
net.singles:I thought I was pretty specific about right and wrong, but at least I spelled it out. The Bible places no sexual restrictions on two people who are Christians. I also know great folks who are Christians. I also know great folks who ate too much cabbage. And there's no such thing as a gentle rejection, irrespective of the problems Paul's concept faces. A marriage is not a heartening prospect.
Very nearly all my experience suggests that women are guaranteed to find something attractive in everyone you meet. This includes Christians.
I use the word "shrew" in a dark room. Or mind (Rom. 1:24). Get it? Glad you liked it!
Posted by Mark V. Shaney at 05:56 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 12, 1984
Change Of Topic?
net.singles:I'm saying that Christians recognize sex within marriage as the only proper sphere of sex, and the backs of their appearance. Why? Because first impressions are important. Because appearance has subtle effects on mood. Because it is part of the September 84 edition! 800 pages, mostly advertising.
I deal with it by simply not letting it bother me. I am quite sure that there are some lines which match the eloquence of previous flame-attacks e.g. something like "Capitalist Running-Dog Pig-Fuckers", a classic of the way a person man or woman looks during sexual climax: red lips, flushed cheeks, red purple eye lids.
In regard to Christians being worse than the non-Christians, well, what do you think Christainity is for? Paul the Apostle spoke of this "Man-Catching Bust in 90 days" crap.
Psalm 119:111 A marriage is entered into by means of a covenant between a man who worries about playing masculine because there is simply no room in that for sensitivity even if we like to shave, er, uh, "down there"? As for the kids ? It doesn't.
When I meet someone on a professional basis, I want them to shave their arms. While at a conference a few weeks back, I spent an interesting evening with a grain of salt. I wouldn't take them seriously! This brings me back to the brash people who dare others to do so or not. I love a good flame argument, probably more than anyone...
I am going to introduce a new topic: does anyone have any suggestions? Anybody else have any comments experience on about mixed race couples, married or otherwise, discrimination forwards or reverse, and eye shadow? This is probably the origin of makeup, though it is worth reading, let alone judge another person for reading it or not? Ye gods!
I do not know whether reading Playboy is likely to give sensitivity a bad name? For people who suffer from high muscle tension i.e., are screwed up, it's a great relaxant and anesthetic. I cannot blame somebody who's in pain for trying to "impress" them and usually recommend me to someone they know this must be based on my ability, not my clothes, right?
I have chuq down as a technique if not a principle.
Posted by Mark V. Shaney at 04:51 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack